Moral Hazard and Renegotiation with Multiple Agents
نویسندگان
چکیده
We investigate the effects of contract renegotiation in multi-agent situations where risk averse agents negotiate a contract offer to the principal after the agents observe a common, unverifiable perfect signal about their actions. We show that renegotiation with multiple agents reduces the cost of implementing any implementable action profile down to the first-best level, even though the principal cannot observe the agents’ actions. Moreover, it is sufficient for the principal to use a “simple” initial contract, in the sense that it consists of no more than a single sharing scheme for each agent and the total payments to the agents are the same regardless of the realised state. An important implication is that decentralization, in the sense of delegated negotiation and proposals from the agents, can be as effective as centralized schemes that utilize revelation mechanisms in unrestricted ways. JEL Classification Numbers: D23, D63, D82, L23
منابع مشابه
Moral hazard, renegotiation, and forgetfulness
When a principal and an agent operate with simple contracts, in equilibrium, renegotiation will occur after the agent takes her action. Since renegotiation makes incentive contracts non-credible, the principal may prefer non-renegotiable monitoring options. The current literature does not fully reconcile these predictions with the observation of simple, non-renegotiated incentive contracts. We ...
متن کاملOptimality of linearity with collusion and renegotiation
This study analyzes a continuous–time N–agent Brownian moral hazard model with constant absolute risk aversion (CARA) utilities, in which agents’ actions jointly determine the mean and the variance of the outcome process. In order to give a theoretical justification for the use of linear contracts, as in Holmstrom and Milgrom (1987), we consider a variant of its generalization given by Sung (19...
متن کاملInvestment and liquidation in renegotiation-proof contracts with moral hazard
In a long-term contract with moral hazard, the liquidation of the firm can arise as the outcome of the optimal contract. However, if the future production capability or market opportunities remain unchanged, liquidation may not be free from renegotiation. Will the firm ever be liquidated if we allow for renegotiation? This paper shows that the firm can still be liquidated even though liquidatio...
متن کاملRenegotiation-Proof Contracts with Moral Hazard and Persistent Private Information
How does renegotiation affect contracts between a principal and an agent subject to persistent private information and moral hazard? This paper introduces a concept of renegotiationproofness, which adapts to stochastic games the concepts of weak renegotiation-proofness and internal consistency by exploiting natural comparisons across states. When the agent has exponential utility and cost of ef...
متن کاملMoral Hazard and Renegotiation: Multi-Period Robustness
Is the second best outcome of static agency models renegotiation proof? In models with one period of renegotiation, Fudenberg and Tirole (1990) answer no when the principal makes the offer, while Ma (1994) and Matthews (1995) answer yes when the agent makes the offer. This paper analyzes the robustness of these two claims when there are more periods of renegotiation. With a known number of peri...
متن کامل